My meeting with Nick My meeting with Nick, Tom and Scott was wonderful and very educational. I am looking forward to working with them. We have been with Cal Net at least 6 months and we are very impressed with the engineers and the level of service that we receive. If you are looking for an excellent IT group...look no further than Cal Net! Jennie Baker

Love their unlimited remote support Love their unlimited remote support! Our on-site engineer is one of the smartest, most patient people we've ever had work on our I.T. We've been with Cal Net for years and expect to grow with them for years to come!!!

CJ was fast CJ was fast, knowledgeable, and corrected my disaster in minutes. Thank you for the wonderful service!

This company is horrible!! This company is horrible!!! We hired them for an MS365 project and things changed after we had a face to face. We had clearly stated what we needed done in the project and they "forgot" about the request and wanted to charge us more for something we thought we had already paid for. Also, part of the project was to activate encryption for our email and their engineer told us it would be a long, drawn out process that was very difficult to accomplish. We got it working in a matter of minutes just the other day. Also, the engineer that was "working" for us, was not a good communicator. I had asked him a question about a program he installed on a server and I didn't type the exact name of the program so he said no, it was not installed. I asked again about a program he installed and then he said well, it was this. He knew what I was getting at but was very contrary and arrogant when he shouldn't be. Needless to say, we will NEVER be utilizing this company again. Their support is far below what you pay for and communication is non-existent. I highly recommend researching this if you have any upcoming projects and need assistance before contacting them.

TBR meeting feedback. I think the TBR meetings are great, thank you. 1. I would appreciate more hand-holding as we walk through the report (ex; what are users vs. endpoints?). 2. Would love the descriptions used on the report itself to be a little more user friendly and less tech-y (ex: 'Windows 2008/3 Servers" reads to me like we have Windows 2008 and we have 3 servers, when I believe the actual meaning is that we have Windows 2008 and a Windows 2003 servers). 3. I don't recall reviewing the 'Strategy' area, and why we got a "yellow" grade there.