Not bad, not good. Nothing wrong, but it also rarely provides me with quality candidates, which isn't necessarily the fault of Monster. My company fronts the cost, so I am unsure if it's worth the value.

Consistent job board with some minor flaws Monster has been good to us over the years for finding qualified candidates. Typically the applications/candidate resumes are a decent fit for the roles we have advertised. Only minor complaints. When positing a job, the categories which a specific job falls under (mostly technology related) need to be added/updated to include more current positions. Also, when positing a job description, even when using the included 'copy/paste' tool, the formatting is inconsistent. (font size change, bullet points are further apart...etc.)

Review Most of the resumes don't have the contact details. Like other job portals, in Monster we are unable to identify candidate visa status like EAD/GC/TN/E3/H1/Citizens.

Being a big company like Monster, they should do better!! Everything on Monster.com is focused on sales, bud if the sales is done there is no much an recruiter or employer can envoi. We are very disappointed about the provided candidate management system, respectively the not good enough tools they provide to teach an recruiter how to use their systems. You should take sometime a look at your competitors in pricing and provided management tools.

So/So Monster is needed but doesn't add anything spectacular. 5 years ago the Power Search was new and a good tool to have. However the "cool tool" is finicky and I trust my boolean more. I will admit with Linkedin Recruiter now available I now find my best candidates from there.