Long-Time researcher I have been using EndNote since 1995. It was an inherently important part of my doctoral research. The ability to create multiple libraries was important. The ability to change format styles is very important as I present and publish papers in different venues. There as more features in EndNotes that I do not use, but I have not had the time to really did deep into the latest version.

Useful, but frustrating to deal with Clarivate. I find EndNote to be extremely useful, but the company seems to be getting greedy and is extremely unresponsive to user input. They capriciously take away features in new versions that were in older versions, like the ability to hide unused fields. Why would anyone take that away? Why can't I share certain libraries with other users, not just one library for everything? Etc. Etc.

New release (EndNote 21.0.1) has issues New release (EndNote 21.0.1) has obvious bug in author lists, listing an extra author in several styles I use. Used to work fine, now broken. A fix is supposedly in the works, but we're almost 3 months past release. A failure of your QC process.

Two of our recent papers Two of our recent papers, both with extensive references that were much easier to manipulate with EndNote. One paper has already been published in May of last year and another is currently in review. I would have dreaded keeping track of these references "by hand". George E. Davis, MD, FACP, FACG

EndNote use in doctoral studies I am a doctoral student, and EndNote does everything I need to do as a reference manager. I use APA 7, and EndNote handles the citations and reference entries well. I find attaching a pdf copy of the article a useful feature.